A lot of people has been going gaga over the last ‘People’s Choice Awards. Why wouldn’t they? People in Hollywood took their time to prep up and show the world why exactly they are where they are. Wouldn’t you just go green with envy? It’s a fabulous affair with the stars coming down to heaven to ‘wow,’ and leave us in awe.
In every rule there will always be exceptions of course. We’re not really talking about the best dressed here. We’re talking about why and how these gorgeous people choose their dress, because apparently some of them doesn’t look like they even put effort in it (or maybe they put a bit TOO much?)
Left to right: Minka Kelly, Leighton Meester, and Kim Kardashian
Photo credit: Christopher Polk/Getty Images, Frazer Harrison/Getty Images. Jason Merritt/Getty Images
Exhibit A. Why oh why? Seriously, what’s up with the strangely similar shaped dresses? And we all know Kim Kardashian is gorgeous with the fabulous skin tone, but why dress in a shiny pillow case when she can easily buy something glam? Honey, when they tell you that you can wear anything, that didn’t meant ANYTHING. It just means a lot of things would look good at you, but some things are just not great who ever wears them.
Left to right: Ashley Tisdale, Kourtney Kardashian, and Mila Kunis
Photo credit: Jason Merritt/Getty Images (2), Frazer Harrison/Getty Images
Then again, it might be something that runs in the family because sister Kourtney Kardashian decided to show up on Kim’s arm with a dress that looks like it wants to spill her breasts or something. Next would be Ashley Tisdale. We can’t really find words to discuss what she was wearing. And Mila Kunis? Her face looks so pretty we just wish we don’t have to look at her dress with the tiered ruffled skirt.
You guys know what’s the common denominator here? Their outfits look like they bought them from Forever 21. We haven’t really done enough research, maybe they did? To be fair, we still love these girls because we all know they CAN be fabulous. We just hope that they always decide to be.
[Source: nymag.com]
